2018-07-23 16:39:34 +00:00
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
sitemap: true
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-11 02:28:33 +00:00
|
|
|
# About
|
|
|
|
|
2018-08-03 15:38:56 +00:00
|
|
|
Yggdrasil is a proof-of-concept to explore a wholly different approach to
|
|
|
|
network routing. Whereas current computer networks depend heavily on very
|
|
|
|
centralised design and configuration, Yggdrasil breaks this mould by making use
|
|
|
|
of a global spanning tree to form a scalable IPv6 encrypted mesh network.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table illustrates high-level differences between traditional
|
|
|
|
networks like the internet, and the Yggdrasil network:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | Traditional | Yggdrasil |
|
|
|
|
| --------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------- | --------- |
|
|
|
|
| End-to-end encryption for all traffic across the network | No | Yes |
|
|
|
|
| Decentralised routing information shared using a DHT | No | Yes |
|
|
|
|
| Cryptographically-bound IPv6 addresses | No | Yes |
|
|
|
|
| Node is aware of its relative location to other nodes | No | Yes |
|
|
|
|
| IPv6 address remains with the device even if moved | No | Yes |
|
|
|
|
| Topology extends gracefully across different mediums, i.e. mesh | No | Yes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### What are the problems today?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The internet as we know it today doesn't conform to a well-defined topology.
|
|
|
|
This has largely happened over time - as the internet has grown, more and more
|
|
|
|
networks have been "bolted together". The lack of defined topology gives us some
|
|
|
|
unavoidable problems:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. The routing tables that hold a "map" of the internet are huge and inefficient
|
|
|
|
1. There isn't really any way for a computer to know where it is located on the
|
|
|
|
internet relative to anything else
|
|
|
|
1. It's difficult to examine where a packet will go on its journey from source
|
|
|
|
to destination without actually sending it
|
|
|
|
1. It's very difficult to install reliable networks into locations that change
|
|
|
|
often or are non-static, i.e. wireless mesh networks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These problems have been partially mitigated (but not really
|
|
|
|
solved) through centralisation - rather than your computers at home holding a
|
|
|
|
copy of the global routing table, your ISP does it for you. Your computers and
|
|
|
|
network devices are configured just to "send it upstream" and to let your ISP
|
|
|
|
decide where it goes from there, but this does leave you entirely at the mercy
|
|
|
|
of your ISP who can redirect your traffic anywhere they like and to inspect,
|
|
|
|
manipulate or intercept it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, wireless meshing requires you to know a lot about the network
|
|
|
|
around you, which would not typically be the case when you have outsourced this
|
|
|
|
knowledge to your ISP. Many existing wireless mesh routing schemes are not
|
|
|
|
scalable or efficient, and do not bridge well with existing networks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### What does Yggdrasil do differently?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yggdrasil takes a very different approach. Rather than just accepting that the
|
|
|
|
internet is a sprawling conglomeration of unstructured networks connected
|
|
|
|
together in an unstructured fashion, we instead arrange the routing scheme of
|
|
|
|
the entire network into a global spanning tree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A spanning tree has the following properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. There is always a single "root" node at the "top" of the tree
|
|
|
|
1. Every other node in the spanning tree has:
|
|
|
|
- Exactly one parent
|
|
|
|
- One or more children
|
|
|
|
1. Every node is connected to at least one other node
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By arranging every device in such a way that they all agree on the same global
|
|
|
|
spanning tree, we can do some things that we previously couldn't do before:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. We can assign a "locator" to a device, effectively a path from the root of
|
|
|
|
the tree downwards
|
|
|
|
1. We can determine where our destination is on the tree up front relative to
|
|
|
|
the source
|
|
|
|
1. We always have a single worst-case-scenario path to every node by
|
|
|
|
"walking the tree"
|
|
|
|
1. We have the ability to infer a number of possible routes (both direct and
|
|
|
|
indirect) from the structure of the tree, and even take "shortcuts"
|
|
|
|
1. We can spread out information about the tree itself across nodes and not need
|
|
|
|
to store it all centrally
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By using a distributed hash table (DHT) to share routing information, this
|
|
|
|
allows any single device on the network to find out enough information to route
|
|
|
|
to another node, without depending on centralised infrastructure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cryptographic signatures are used when exchanging routing information between
|
|
|
|
peers, such that the network can agree on the same candidate to be the global
|
|
|
|
root and to lay out the coordinates of each node beneath it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### What are the benefits?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It should be efficient for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. It lets every device on the network make the same assumptions about the
|
|
|
|
topology of the network
|
|
|
|
1. The use of locators for sending traffic across the network simplifies the
|
|
|
|
switching layer, as forwarding does not require nodes to maintain state tables
|
|
|
|
of anything beyond their own peers
|
|
|
|
1. All route determination is automatic - no manual configuration of routes is
|
|
|
|
required
|
|
|
|
1. Devices don't need to store lots of information about the topology of the
|
|
|
|
network - in fact, storing information about only a small number of nodes is
|
|
|
|
usually enough to reach the entire network
|
|
|
|
1. We can bridge reliable/static networks very easily with dynamic/non-static
|
|
|
|
networks without flooding large amounts of routing information between different
|
|
|
|
areas (i.e. point-to-point or mesh wireless networks)
|
|
|
|
1. The network responds gracefully to changes in topology without intervention,
|
|
|
|
and networks can even join and split without interrupting connectivity between
|
|
|
|
local nodes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that Yggdrasil should be able to scale to very large networks as a
|
|
|
|
result.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### What is the status of the project?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yggdrasil is currently an alpha project, early in development but actively
|
|
|
|
maintained. Our expectation is that a future “beta” quality release should know
|
|
|
|
enough to be compatible in the face of wire format changes, and reasonably
|
|
|
|
feature complete. A “stable” 1.0 release, if it ever happens, would probably be
|
|
|
|
feature complete, with no expectation of future wire format changes, and free of
|
|
|
|
known critical bugs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The true goal of this project is to test the scalability of the Yggdrasil
|
|
|
|
routing scheme, therefore it needs as many participants to run and test the
|
|
|
|
software as possible so that we can study the behaviour of the network as it
|
2021-06-06 14:11:28 +00:00
|
|
|
grows. We've done our best to support [as many platforms as possible](installation.md)
|
2018-08-03 15:38:56 +00:00
|
|
|
and have a number of [public peers](https://github.com/yggdrasil-network/public-peers)
|
|
|
|
that you can connect to in order to join the network, so please feel free to
|
|
|
|
experiment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The project is likely to reach a number of possible outcomes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. The project may reach a reasonably stable state but never attract a large
|
|
|
|
enough number of users
|
|
|
|
1. The project may attract a large enough number of users but reveal inherent
|
|
|
|
design flaws in the process (a learning exercise for a future project perhaps)
|
|
|
|
1. The project may end up working perfectly even as the network grows, in which
|
|
|
|
case it will become worthwhile to look at writing better-optimised
|
|
|
|
implementations and/or moving the important parts into other projects (like
|
|
|
|
[cjdns](https://github.com/cjdelisle/cjdns))
|
|
|
|
|